The Dog's Tits
Little Tiny Wit
Sasha Castel
Tim Blair
James Morrow
USS Clueless
Damian Penny
Gareth Parker
James Randi
Little Green Footballs

Some Bloody Wog
Rachel Lucas

Premium core
Paul Wright
libertarian.org.au
Jane Galt
Kathy Kinsley
Bizzare Science
Silent Running
Jason Soon
Samizdata
Eject Eject Eject!!!
Daniel Pipes
Scott of The Eye

Beautifully Wicked
Bitchin' Monaro Guide
Drivel Warehouse
Little Tiny Lies
Sup
port Israel
Capitalist Chicks
Evil Godless Swine
Professor Bunyip
The Rottweiler
Right Wing News
Clubbeaux
Spleenville
Bleedin' Brain


Anti-suckage
Le Québécois Libre
Hot Buttered Death
Vodkapundit
Vigilant TV
Pejman

Acidman
A Small Victory

Aussies Up Your Arse
Bargarz
Angry Anderson
After Grog Blog
Ken Parish
Brain Graze
Amax Weblog

John Quiggin

Dickheads Galore
Dick Neville
aus.politics
The Daily Saddam
George Monbiot
Jew Killers United
Pilger
I Love Osama
The Guardian
Screeching Dweebs
Noam Chomsky
John Gotti Fanzine
Green Left Weekly
The Independent

 

Live Whacking Permalink Archive
click "Live Whacking" button for the latest entries


19-2-03

Quote of the day

Just because the Spartacists march in your rally and hold up signs supporting North Korea doesn’t mean anyone else believes in their twisted cause. But mass movements have a way of being hijacked by the ardent few, the ones who are damned dead serious about overturning the established order and oiling up the guillotine to deal with the undecided. Their work is made easier by comfortable dilettantes who think it’s funny to call Bush a Nazi - or who march without comment beside someone who does.

- James Lileks

(link via Damian Penny)
permalink


Anti-war ponderings

Fellow Canberra libertarian John Humphreys doesn't much care for my recent opinions of last weekend's anti-war marches.

As I argue in my response, John's protest seems to rest on his overly defensive assumption that his own sensible anti-war arguments (and those of other libertarians) can be lumped in with those of the "chanting + banners = truth" crowd, and the bizarre assertion that calling that particular crowd on their mad ravings is somehow dismissive of serious debate. I ask: what 'serious debate' is that crowd capable of engaging in?
permalink

 

Motorcycles
MC News
AMA Superbikes
Motorcycle News
Perth Bikes
Bon Trikes
Oz Trikes
Allmoto
MotoGP

Women
Holly Valance
Eliza Dushku
Katherine Heigl
Michelle Williams
Kate Winslet
Kristin Kreuk

Kulcha
Dark Horizons
CHUD
Roger Ebert
RAGE

Info'mation
FrontPage Mag
Snopes
The Smoking Gun
Straight Dope
Against Nature
Australian Skeptics
CSICOP
IPA

Assorted Gubshite
Draggin Jeans
Really Cute Chess Geek
Miniguns
Pure rancour
Brunching Shuttlecocks
The Onion
killfrog.com
Omega Chess
Barrett Rifles

Brews
Coopers Ale

Subzero
Cougar
Hahn Ice
Strongbow
Carlsberg
Crown Lager
Carlton Draught
Tooheys New
James Squire