Writings & rants
About this site....

The Dog's Tits
Sasha Castel
Tim Blair
James Morrow
Jason Soon
VodkaPundit
Paul Wright
Bitchin' Monaro Guide
Drivel Warehouse
Damian Penny
Scott Wickstein
Gareth Parker
James Randi
Little Green Footballs
Rachel Lucas
Kathy Kinsley
Instapundit

These don't suck
Samizdata
Support Israel
Capitalist Chicks
Evil Godless Swine
Pejman
Really Cute Chess Geek
Daniel Pipes
Shannon Davies
Professor Bunyip
Alan Anderson
Hot Buttered Death
Cold Fury
The Rottweiler
Ken Parish
Right Wing News
After Grog Blog
Dodgeblog
Brain Graze
Amax Weblog

Dickheads Galore
Dick Neville
aus.politics
The Mirror
George Monbiot
Jew Killers United
Pilger
I Love Osama
The Guardian
Screeching Dweebs
Noam Chomsky
John Gotti Fanzine

Motorcycles
MC News
AMA Superbikes
Motorcycle News
Perth Bikes
Bon Trikes
Oz Trikes
Allmoto
MotoGP

Women
Holly Valance
Eliza Dushku
Katherine Heigl
Michelle Williams

Kulcha
Dark Horizons
CHUD
Roger Ebert
Urban Cinephile
RAGE

Info'mation
FrontPage Mag
Snopes
The Smoking Gun
Straight Dope
Against Nature
Australian Skeptics
CSICOP
IPA

Assorted Gubshite
Draggin Jeans
Miniguns
Pure rancour
Brunching Shuttlecocks
The Onion
killfrog.com

Brews
Subzero
Fuckin' COUGAR!!!
Hahn Ice
Carlton Cold
Strongbow
Carlsberg
Crown Lager

Live Whacking Permalink Archive
click "Live Whacking" button for the latest entries


7-10-02

More Fart than Art
..... or How I learned to say "Fuck The Opera"

In today's tedious S.M.H. column, enternal whinging feminist and culturati Anne Summers joins the ranks of very silly people who demand we spend even more millions of taxpayers' money on arts funding.

'Tis suits, not genius, that strut the stage
Artists such as Simone Young create something priceless, yet it's profiteers that are idolised, writes Anne Summers.

Having a howling error in the first line of a column is never a good sign. It's obviously escaped the attention of Summers and other culturati dingbats that big-money executives have rather a bad image in Australia right now. Hello Anne, heard of OneTel & HIH?

What kind of country are we that our largest companies can find more than $50 million to throw at past-their-use-by-date departing CEOs, yet we are unable to dredge up a mere $2 million to hang onto the internationally renowned music director of our national opera company?

A country where there are some very stupid people in corporate life who are willing to spend big money on bad CEOs. Welcome to the world of freedom of choice and private enterprise. Then again, none of us is forced to pay for those pricks, whereas we can do nothing about the millions of our tax payments that fund your middle-class cultural welfare.

The sacking of Simone Young by the board of Opera Australia last month highlights an alarming trend in Australia to financially reward mediocrity or incompetence in the corporate world but to punish striving for excellence in the performing arts.

Punish? She was being paid with my fucking money!!! Who the hell asked our permission to shell out our money to subsidise the entertainment of the Opera crowd?

The decision of the OA board not to renew Young's contract was, according to board chairman Rowena Danziger, financially motivated "by a need to ensure the national opera company's sustainable development". Specifically, it has been reported, Young's artistic plans for the 2004 season exceeded the budget by $2 million.

The person whose hiring just three years ago was hailed as such a coup for OA, and whose musical vision promised to elevate our opera to new standards of excellence, was let go for want of a couple of million dollars.

A couple of million dollars over and above the millions of dollars of our money that is already being used to keep this unpopular art form afloat.

It was not the artistic vision as such that was at issue - Young delivered what she had promised in terms of improving the orchestra and expanding the repertoire - it was just that the OA could not afford it. Nor was Young's own remuneration an issue. She just wanted to produce a fabulous season.

A "fabulous season" which is so popular with the public that it cannot survive on its own financially. That's some vital art form you got there.

Of course, the likes of Summers and other art-industry bludgers like Leo Schofield never suggest the easiest and most obvious solution: that the opera audience should pay for it themselves. You know, like people who like (gulp) rock and roll. Ah, but that's not culturally important is it?

[...a whole paragraph of examples over overpaid execs follows. Zzzz...]

These financial excesses point to a shameless self-aggrandisement among our corporate elite. They take home salaries, bonuses, interest-free loans and all kinds of other perks that are unjustifiable on any terms.

What, so companies shouldn't be allowed to offer their money and perks to attract talent, and improve performance, but useless individuals like Simone Young can take my money to fund her art form whether I'm interested in it or not? The art-left love using everyone else's money to fund their interests.

In Europe and the United States, opera companies attract significant donations from bizoids anxious to improve their cultural cred. Not so here. It is almost impossible to get our wealthiest individuals to give money to the arts (unless it's to buy stuff to increase in value while it hangs on their walls). They support medical charities, up to a point, but overall we lack a philanthropic tradition. And while we expect governments to subsidise everything from sports training to the price of pharmaceuticals, we are far less demanding of our financial elite.

Ah, here's the rub: the evil capitalists aren't giving enough of their money to the beloved Opera, so they should be forced to.

Yet if as a society we want the performances at the Sydney Opera House to match the bravura of the building - and we claim we do - we need to find the funds to do it.

How about fucking paying for it yourself!!!! And this society of ours clearly doesn't want it: if the audience was there to support it, you wouldn't need our fucking money to prop it up, you dopey asscow.

The board of OA has a clear duty to be fiscally responsible, but it has an equally important mandate to nurture excellence in the company. Its mission statement includes the undertaking: to "attract, develop, challenge and retain people of the highest calibre within an organisation that is effectively led, well-informed and in which their contribution is respected and celebrated".

The Young episode represents a failure to meet just about every one of these goals.

Oh, heaven forfend!! The poor opera crowd, already bloated with millions of dollars of taxpayers' money, expresses outrage that the board of Opera Australia would actually exercise some restraint in spending money it doesn't have on an artform hardly anyone wants.

Equally disturbing are the unattributed comments in the media by board members and other "sources" that the board's decision was about more than money. Opera CEO Adrian Collette wrote to the company's supporters recently stating that "out of respect for Simone and our company" no further comments would be made about the episode. However, this has not stopped some insiders from briefing some journalists (not this one) that Young was "abrasive" and "autocratic". (Isn't criticising a conductor for being autocratic a bit like attacking a social worker for being compassionate?) Someone else complained about Young's "brinkmanship". She went to the wall to fight for her vision, apparently. That's what artistic directors are supposed to do - yet it cost her her job.

Oh, the poor dear. She demands to go a piffling two million dollars over budget, paid for by people like me, and she loses her job for it. Well boo-hoo.

An especially damaging comment was made to this newspaper the day of her termination: "Her vision was going to cost a bundle and she had to bring something to the party, but this wasn't happening." I would have thought she brought her name, her reputation, her musical vision and her skills.

And how about an ability to recoup the fucking costs?

In the same vein, critics of the board's decision have been trashed by OA management. People who wrote critical letters to the press had their names run through the OA data base. Less than 10 per cent of them had bought tickets in the past seven years, said Liz Nield , the company's marketing and communications director.

As if members of the public are not entitled to comment on decisions of an arts organisation that receives substantial taxpayer funds. This exercise reveals a level of petty vindictiveness that is, sadly, all too typical of arts management in this country.

Strange that she uses a dozen or so letters from the "public" the prove her point, yet is unwilling to admit to herself that the vast majority of the public has no interest whatsoever in financially supporting the opera by paying a fair ticket price. I guess the culturally unwashed amongst us shouldn't be able to decide how to spend our money.

Young's leaving is not just a reprise of the departures of other talented and demanding artists whose vision was deemed to be "unsustainable" by their managements - think Meryl Tankard, Maina Geilgud, Barrie Kosky - it also has depressing parallels with the history of the very building in which Young worked.

A whole roll-call of people who produced monumentally boring art nobody gave a shit about or wanted to spend money on. Good fucking riddance.

In 1966, the NSW government failed to retain the services of the architect Joern Utzon, whose bold and brave design for an opera house had been commissioned by the previous regime. In 2002, a new opera board has sent packing the brilliant and visionary musician recruited by its predecessor a mere three years ago.

The problem for the future is that it will be next to impossible to recruit a stellar replacement for Young. Who in their right mind would take a job that is now internationally branded as being, artistically speaking, for the vision-impaired?

Hopefully, the answer is "nobody". You want them here? Pay a fair ticket price for the shows you attend.

When us rock n' roll fans want to get U2 out here, we support promoters by paying big-ass money for our tickets. Why don't you do the same for your damned opera tickets? Why should your upper-class twat-art be supported with our money?

I wouldn't be as pissed off with the likes of Summers if they were are least consistent about it: they should bloody well spread the arts funding around to help fund fund big rock tours and give us cheaper movie tickets. These things, of course, are nothing but coarse, low-rent cultural pollution, whereas you guys are artistic and cultural, right?

Maybe the board should rethink - and perhaps put the wood on some of those overpaid corporates to fork out some of those millions to keep Young at the helm of our national opera. Perhaps one or more of them might volunteer.

Lowy has said he intends to donate his $11.9 million salary to charity. Frank, here's an idea: donate it to Opera Australia and ask them to renew Young's contract. With almost $12 million in the coffers they could more than afford her next three seasons and Australia would not lose another stellar artist to more generous overseas pastures.

Anne, here's an idea: maybe he could give the $12 million to such horrid, culturally irrelevant endeavours like the Smith Family, the Red Cross, the Royal Flying Doctor Service or the Hollows Foundation. (Ah, but where's the culture?)

Piss off and use your own money for a change.
permalink